POINTS (20 points max) |
5 |
4-3 |
2-1 |
Quality |
Postings and replies were excellent in their discussion of required readings, demonstrating mastery of the course material, and contained new or original thought. Scientific theory was consistently incorporated in order to support opinion statements. Content fostered class discussion through the incorporation of textbook and/or outside sources. |
Postings and replies were adequate in their discussion of required readings, but |
Postings and replies were poor in their discussion of required readings, and did not foster new or original thought. Scientific theory was not incorporated in order to support opinion statements. |
Spelling and grammar |
Postings and replies contained little to no errors in spelling, grammar, and/or word choice. |
Postings and replies contained more than a few errors in spelling, grammar, and/or word choice. |
Postings and replies contained major errors in spelling, grammar, and word choice that substantially impeded response readability |
On-time |
Made an initial post in each forum by due date and replied by due date |
Made initial post by due date with no replies or late replies that did not feed discussion |
Did not post or reply on-time |
Word count |
Met or exceeded minimum posting schedule requirements. All main posts met the word requirement of 200 words. All reply posts met the minimum requirement of 100 words per post |
Did not meet the word requirement of 200 words per main post and 100 words per reply. |
Using Mod 1 – Reading 1 – Intro to Construction, answer the question that is color-coded to match your name in the team assignments found below.
Each person must also reply to at least two of the individuals on your team in the blog.
Question1: Will complying with OSHA standards ensure zero injuries at a job site? Explain your answer.