high on Essays logo

Our Services

Get 15% Discount on your First Order

Stress Activity – Rubric Origins of Stress 5.5 points Criteria Description Discuss the origins of stress and how stress affects people, 5.

Stress Activity – Rubric

Origins of Stress 5.5 points

Criteria Description

Discuss the origins of stress and how stress affects people,

5. Target 5.5 points

Chosen medium expertly discusses the origins of stress and how

stress affects people, and discussion is comprehensive and

insightful with relevant evidence cited to support claims. Chosen

medium demonstrates an exceptional understanding of the topic.

4. Acceptable 4.68 points

Chosen medium clearly discusses the origins of stress and how

stress affects people, and discussion is strong with sound analysis

and some cited evidence to support claims. Chosen medium

demonstrates an understanding that extends beyond the surface

of the topic.

3. Approaching 4.13 points

Chosen medium adequately discusses the origins of stress and

how stress affects people, but discussion is limited and lacks some

evidence to support claims. Chosen medium demonstrates a basic

understanding of the topic.

2. Insufficient 3.58 points

Chosen medium inadequately discusses the origins of stress and

how stress affects people, but discussion is weak and missing

evidence to support claims. Chosen medium demonstrates a poor

understanding of the topic.

Collapse All

5/4/24, 1:22 AM
Page 1 of 14

1. Unsatisfactory 0 points

Chosen medium omits or incompletely discusses the origins of

stress and how stress affects people. Chosen medium does not

demonstrate understanding of the topic.

5/4/24, 1:22 AM
Page 2 of 14

Identifies Risks of Stress 8.25 points

5/4/24, 1:22 AM
Page 3 of 14

Criteria Description

Chosen medium expertly identifies risks of stress.

5. Target 8.25 points

Chosen medium expertly identifies risks of stress, and description

is comprehensive and insightful with relevant evidence cited to

support claims. Chosen medium demonstrates an exceptional

understanding of the topic.

4. Acceptable 7.01 points

Chosen medium clearly identifies risks of stress, and description is

strong with sound analysis and some cited evidence to support

claims. Chosen medium demonstrates an understanding that

extends beyond the surface of the topic.

3. Approaching 6.19 points

Chosen medium adequately identifies risks of stress, but

description is limited and lacks some cited evidence to support

claims. Chosen medium demonstrates a basic understanding of

the topic.

2. Insufficient 5.36 points

Chosen medium inadequately identifies risks of stress, but

description is weak and missing cited evidence to support claims.

Chosen medium demonstrates a poor understanding of the topic.

1. Unsatisfactory 0 points

Chosen medium omits or incompletely identifies risks of stress.

Chosen medium does not demonstrate understanding of the topic.

5/4/24, 1:22 AM
Page 4 of 14

Identifies Biopsychosocial E!ects of Stress 8.25 points

Criteria Description

Chosen medium expertly identifies biopsychosocial effects of stress.

5. Target 8.25 points

Chosen medium expertly identifies biopsychosocial effects of

stress, and description is comprehensive and insightful with

relevant evidence cited to support claims. Chosen medium

demonstrates an exceptional understanding of the topic.

4. Acceptable 7.01 points

Chosen medium clearly identifies biopsychosocial effects of stress,

and description is strong with sound analysis and some cited

evidence to support claims. Chosen medium demonstrates an

understanding that extends beyond the surface of the topic.

3. Approaching 6.19 points

Chosen medium adequately identifies biopsychosocial effects of

stress, but description is limited and lacks some cited evidence to

support claims. Chosen medium demonstrates a basic

understanding of the topic.

2. Insufficient 5.36 points

Chosen medium inadequately identifies biopsychosocial effects of

stress, but description is weak and missing cited evidence to

support claims. Chosen medium demonstrates a poor

understanding of the topic.

1. Unsatisfactory 0 points

Chosen medium omits or incompletely identifies biopsychosocial

5/4/24, 1:22 AM
Page 5 of 14

effects of stress. Chosen medium does not demonstrate

understanding of the topic.

5/4/24, 1:22 AM
Page 6 of 14

Coping with Stress 11 points

Criteria Description

Discuss at least three ways that an individual can manage and cope

with stress.

5. Target 11 points

Chosen medium expertly discusses at least three ways an

individual can manage and cope with stress, and discussion is

comprehensive and insightful with relevant evidence cited to

support claims. Chosen medium demonstrates an exceptional

understanding of the topic.

4. Acceptable 9.35 points

Chosen medium clearly discusses at least three ways an individual

can manage and cope with stress, and discussion is strong with

sound analysis and some cited evidence to support claims. Chosen

medium demonstrates an understanding that extends beyond the

surface of the topic.

3. Approaching 8.25 points

Chosen medium adequately discusses at least three ways an

individual can manage and cope with stress, but discussion is

limited and lacks some cited evidence to support claims. Chosen

medium demonstrates a basic understanding of the topic.

2. Insufficient 7.15 points

Chosen medium inadequately discusses at least three ways an

individual can manage and cope with stress, but discussion is weak

and missing cited evidence to support claims. Chosen medium

demonstrates a poor understanding of the topic.

5/4/24, 1:22 AM
Page 7 of 14

1. Unsatisfactory 0 points

Chosen medium omits or incompletely discusses at least three

ways an individual can manage and cope with stress. Chosen

medium does not demonstrate understanding of the topic.

5/4/24, 1:22 AM
Page 8 of 14

Resources Available for Support 8.25 points

Criteria Description

Chosen medium identifies local networks, groups, and local resources

available for support.

5. Target 8.25 points

Chosen medium expertly identifies local networks, groups, and

local resources available for support. Chosen medium

demonstrates an exceptional understanding of the topic.

4. Acceptable 7.01 points

Chosen medium clearly identifies local networks, groups, and local

resources available for support. Chosen medium demonstrates an

understanding that extends beyond the surface of the topic.

3. Approaching 6.19 points

Chosen medium adequately identifies local networks, groups, and

local resources available for support. Chosen medium

demonstrates a basic understanding of the topic.

2. Insufficient 5.36 points

Chosen medium inadequately identifies local networks, groups,

and local resources available for support. Chosen medium

demonstrates a poor understanding of the topic.

1. Unsatisfactory 0 points

Chosen medium omits or incompletely identifies local networks,

groups, and local resources available for support. Chosen medium

does not demonstrate understanding of the topic.

5/4/24, 1:22 AM
Page 9 of 14

Visual Appeal 5.5 points

5/4/24, 1:22 AM
Page 10 of 14

Criteria Description

Visual Appeal

5. Target 5.5 points

Appropriate and thematic graphic elements are used to make

visual connections that contribute to the understanding of

concepts, ideas, and relationships. Differences in type size or color

are used well and consistently.

4. Acceptable 4.68 points

Thematic graphic elements are used but not always in context.

Visual connections mostly contribute to the understanding of

concepts, ideas, and relationships. Differences in type size or color

are used well and consistently.

3. Approaching 4.13 points

Minimal use of graphic elements is evident. Elements do not

consistently contribute to the understanding of concepts, ideas,

and relationships. There is some variation in type size, color, and

layout.

2. Insufficient 3.58 points

Color is garish and/or typographic variations are overused and

legibility suffers. Background interferes with readability.

Understanding of concepts, ideas, and relationships is limited.

1. Unsatisfactory 0 points

There are few or no graphic elements. No variation in layout or

typography is evident.

5/4/24, 1:22 AM
Page 11 of 14

Presentation 5.5 points

Criteria Description

Presentation

5. Target 5.5 points

The submission is presented effectively and all of the required

elements creatively contribute to the presentation of the concepts.

4. Acceptable 4.68 points

The submission is presented effectively and contains all of the

required elements.

3. Approaching 4.13 points

The submission contains minor inconsistencies that are not overly

distracting. Presentation contains a majority of the required

elements.

2. Insufficient 3.58 points

The submission is ineffective, contains multiple inconsistencies, or

is missing a few of the required elements.

1. Unsatisfactory 0 points

The submission is incoherent, contains major inconsistencies, is

not presented effectively, or is missing a substantial amount of the

required elements.

5/4/24, 1:22 AM
Page 12 of 14

Mechanics of Writing 1.65 points

Criteria Description

Includes spelling, capitalization, punctuation, grammar, language use,

sentence structure, etc.

5. Target 1.65 points

No mechanical errors are present. Appropriate language choice

and sentence structure are used throughout.

4. Acceptable 1.4 points

Few mechanical errors are present. Suitable language choice and

sentence structure are used.

3. Approaching 1.24 points

Occasional mechanical errors are present. Language choice is

generally appropriate. Varied sentence structure is attempted.

2. Insufficient 1.07 points

Frequent and repetitive mechanical errors are present.

Inconsistencies in language choice or sentence structure are

recurrent.

1. Unsatisfactory 0 points

Errors in grammar or syntax are pervasive and impede meaning.

Incorrect language choice or sentence structure errors are found

throughout.

5/4/24, 1:22 AM
Page 13 of 14

Format/Documentation 1.1 points

Criteria Description

Uses appropriate style, such as APA, MLA, etc., for college, subject,

and level; documents sources using citations, footnotes, references,

bibliography, etc., appropriate to assignment and discipline.

5. Target 1.1 points

No errors in formatting or documentation are present.

4. Acceptable 0.94 points

Appropriate format and documentation are used with only minor

errors.

3. Approaching 0.83 points

Appropriate format and documentation are used, although there

are some obvious errors.

2. Insufficient 0.72 points

Appropriate format is attempted, but some elements are missing.

Frequent errors in documentation of sources are evident.

1. Unsatisfactory 0 points

Appropriate format is not used. No documentation of sources is

provided.

Total 55 points

© 2024. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2024. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2024. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2024. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2024. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2024. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2024. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2024. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2024. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.

5/4/24, 1:22 AM
Page 14 of 14

Share This Post

Email
WhatsApp
Facebook
Twitter
LinkedIn
Pinterest
Reddit
Reviews

Order a Similar Paper and get 15% Discount on your First Order

Related Questions

  What are the main hypotheses? What is/are independent variable(s)? What is/are dependent variable(s)? How did researchers recruit their participants?

  What are the main hypotheses? What is/are independent variable(s)? What is/are dependent variable(s)? How did researchers recruit their participants? Identify participants’ demographic information and data collection procedure. What materials did researchers utilize to measure the hypotheses? Identify the apparatus and measurements. What are the key findings/results of the study?